From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030389AbWGTWPr (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:15:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030390AbWGTWPr (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:15:47 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:34252 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030389AbWGTWPr (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:15:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:14:52 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: David Greaves , Kasper Sandberg , Justin Piszcz , Torsten Landschoff , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, ml@magog.se, radsaq@gmail.com Subject: Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) Message-ID: <20060721081452.B1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy> <20060719085731.C1935136@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost> <20060720171310.B1970528@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <44BF8500.1010708@dgreaves.com> <20060720161121.GA26748@tuatara.stupidest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20060720161121.GA26748@tuatara.stupidest.org>; from cw@f00f.org on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:11:21AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 09:11:21AM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:28:32PM +0100, David Greaves wrote: > > > Does this problem exist in 2.16.6.x?? > > The change was merged after 2.6.16.x was branched, I was mistaken > in how long I thought the bug has been about. > > > I hope so because I assumed there simply wasn't a patch for 2.6.16 and > > applied this 'best guess' to my servers and rebooted/remounted successfully. > > Doing the correct change to 2.6.16.x won't hurt, but it's not > necessary. Yep. As Chris said, 2.6.17 is the only affected kernel. I've fixed up the whacky html formatting and my merge error (thanks to all for reporting those) so its a bit more readable now. cheers. -- Nathan