From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
Cc: petero2@telia.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: [patch] lockdep: annotate pktcdvd natural device hierarchy
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:27:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060724192718.547a836e.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44BA1609.9050305@free.fr>
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:33:45 +0200
Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr> wrote:
>
> Thank you Peter, the above patch removed the "possible recursive
> locking detected" message.
>
> Now, I've got a new one (will this thread never end ?):
>
> pktcdvd: writer pktcdvd0 mapped to hdc
> INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [<c0104db5>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> [<c0104dd1>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1c
> [<c012c2e1>] __lock_acquire+0x10f/0x9a5
> [<c012cbd7>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x80
> [<c0292131>] _spin_lock_irq+0x1f/0x2e
> [<c028fe86>] wait_for_completion+0x29/0xe5
> [<e1136299>] pkt_generic_packet+0x1bb/0x1e8 [pktcdvd]
> [<e113671a>] pkt_get_disc_info+0x3d/0x77 [pktcdvd]
> [<e113836f>] pkt_open+0xc3/0xbf4 [pktcdvd]
> [<c0159c36>] do_open+0xa1/0x3bd
> [<c015a179>] blkdev_open+0x1f/0x48
> [<c0151c87>] __dentry_open+0xb8/0x186
> [<c0151dc3>] nameidata_to_filp+0x1c/0x2e
> [<c0151e03>] do_filp_open+0x2e/0x35
> [<c0152ce1>] do_sys_open+0x40/0xbb
> [<c0152d88>] sys_open+0x16/0x18
> [<c0102c2d>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
I assume this:
--- a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c~pktcdvd-lockdep-fixes-fix
+++ a/drivers/block/pktcdvd.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int pkt_generic_packet(struct pkt
char sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE];
request_queue_t *q;
struct request *rq;
- DECLARE_COMPLETION(wait);
+ DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
int err = 0;
q = bdev_get_queue(pd->bdev);
_
will shut that up.
Arjan, do we still need
lockdep-annotate-pktcdvd-natural-device-hierarchy.patch?
And could you please take a look at Peter's block_dev.c changes? Closely,
please - it'd be nice to get this right one of these days ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-25 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-08 19:09 2.6.17-rc6-mm1/pktcdvd - BUG: possible circular locking Laurent Riffard
2006-06-12 15:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-12 16:41 ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-21 10:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-22 14:50 ` Peter Osterlund
2006-06-22 18:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-14 11:22 ` Peter Osterlund
2006-07-14 13:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-14 21:06 ` Peter Osterlund
2006-07-14 22:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-15 7:04 ` [patch] lockdep: annotate pktcdvd natural device hierarchy Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-15 10:35 ` Laurent Riffard
2006-07-15 10:57 ` Peter Osterlund
2006-07-16 10:33 ` Laurent Riffard
2006-07-25 2:27 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-07-25 5:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-25 6:31 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060724192718.547a836e.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=laurent.riffard@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=petero2@telia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®