From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964810AbWGYSVl (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:21:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964809AbWGYSVl (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:21:41 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:23107 "EHLO fmsmga101-1.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964807AbWGYSVk (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:21:40 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.07,180,1151910000"; d="scan'208"; a="104004956:sNHT15491819" Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:04:34 -0700 From: Kristen Carlson Accardi To: "Brown, Len" Cc: gnychis@cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: ACPI bombing, ACPI Exception (acpi_bus-0071): AE_NOT_FOUND Message-Id: <20060725110434.06408186.kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:44:06 -0700 "Brown, Len" wrote: > > >> Hey guys, > >> > >> I am running a 2.6.18-rc1-git7 kernel on my IBM Thinkpad x60s, with > >> CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y > >> > >> Whenever the computer is inserted into the dock, ACPI seems to bomb: > >> http://rafb.net/paste/results/GW5E8747.html > >> > >> I was wondering if anyone could help me solve this problem, > >I believe it > >> is keeping me from using my cdrom drive on the dock since it does not > >> show up in /dev. I have also contacted Kristen Accardi > >about it, who I > >> believe wrote the dock code... but I wasn't sure if this is a further > >> problem in ACPI somewhere. > >> > >> Here is my full config: > >> http://rafb.net/paste/results/o2gSVu90.html > >> > >> Thanks! > >> George > > >Hello everyone, > >I am working on getting an x60 to duplicate the cdrom issue > >this week. However, I was wondering if there was anything we > >could do about these AE_NOT_FOUND messages. A lot of people > >believe that they are errors, but in fact they are normal for > >hotplugging. Would it be ok if I just get rid of that error > >message? It generates unneccessary consternation. > > In 2.6.17, this was a DEBUG message. > I'll return it to being a DEBUG message for 2.6.18. > > BTW. I can't follow the URLs above, hopefully you can. > stashing logs in a bugzilla entry is generally a better method, > because "bugzilla never forgets". > > thanks, > -Len I can't follow them either, but I had looked at them earlier in the week when George contacted me privately. Of course, I stupidly didn't save them then. George, can you make sure you have all this information stored in a bugzilla entry, and the bugzilla can be assigned to me. Thanks, Kristen