From: nhorman@tuxdriver.com
To: kernel-janitors@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nhorman@tuxdriver.com, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: [KJ] audit return code handling for kernel_thread [4/11]
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:07:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607282007.k6SK7SW2009612@ra.tuxdriver.com> (raw)
Audit/Cleanup of kernel_thread calls, specifically checking of return codes.
Problems seemed to fall into 3 main categories:
1) callers of kernel_thread were inconsistent about meaning of a zero return
code. Some callers considered a zero return code to mean success, others took
it to mean failure. a zero return code, while not actually possible in the
current implementation, should be considered a success (pid 0 is/should be
valid). fixed all callers to treat zero return as success
2) caller of kernel_thread saved return code of kernel_thread for later use
without ever checking its value. Callers who did this tended to assume a
non-zero return was success, and would often wait for a completion queue to be
woken up, implying that an error (negative return code) from kernel_thread could
lead to deadlock. Repaired by checking return code at call time, and setting
saved return code to zero in the event of an error.
3) callers of kernel_thread never bothered to check the return code at all.
This can lead to seemingly unrelated errors later in execution. Fixed by
checking return code at call time and printing a warning message on failure.
Regards
Neil
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
init/do_mounts_initrd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void __init handle_initrd(void)
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
pid = kernel_thread(do_linuxrc, "/linuxrc", SIGCHLD);
- if (pid > 0) {
+ if (pid >= 0) {
while (pid != sys_wait4(-1, NULL, 0, NULL))
yield();
}
reply other threads:[~2006-07-28 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607282007.k6SK7SW2009612@ra.tuxdriver.com \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome