From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751026AbWG3Qv6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:51:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751001AbWG3Qv5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:51:57 -0400 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:456 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807AbWG3Qv5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:51:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:51:38 +0200 From: bert hubert To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, davej@redhat.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tony@atomide.com, akpm@osdl.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4 Message-ID: <20060730165137.GA26511@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, davej@redhat.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tony@atomide.com, akpm@osdl.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk References: <20060730120844.GA18293@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20060730160738.GB13377@irc.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060730160738.GB13377@irc.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I have similar problem with cpufreq-nforce2 -- http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/7/234 > I haven't do a git-bisect yet. To recap, cpufreq died for at least two people (Tomasz Torcz and me) between 2.6.17 and 2.6.18-rc1. I've cc'd everybody who touched cpufreq according to the shortlog. Abundant details are in: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/30/87 New information is that I've narrowed it down from between 2.6.16.9 and 2.6.18-rc1 to between 2.6.17.7 (which works) and 2.6.18-rc1 (which doesn't). The problem exists both with cpufreq as modules and staticly, and both with P4 and nforce2. Please let me know how I can help you solve this problem. I'll try a git bisect but a lot of the cpufreq changes appear to be interrelated, so I'm unsure if it will work. Thanks! -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services