From: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
To: Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>
Cc: Amit Gud <agud@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] sysctl for the latecomers
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:56:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608021456.k72EujBt007376@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com> of "Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:22:22 EST." <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608011213190.12077@turbotaz.ourhouse>
Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Chase Venters wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Amit Gud wrote:
> >> /etc/sysctl.conf values are of no use to kernel modules that are inserted
> >> after init scripts call sysctl for the values in /etc/sysctl.conf
> >>
> >> For modules to use the values stored in the file /etc/sysctl.conf, sysctl
> >> kernel code can keep record of 'limited' values, for sysctl entries which
> >> haven't been registered yet. During registration, sysctl code can check
> >> against the stored values and call the appropriate strategy and
> >> proc_handler routines if a match is found.
> >>
> >> Attached patch does just that. This patch is NOT tested and is just to
> >> get opinions, if something like this is a right way of addressing this
> >> problem.
> > Do you anticipate any users that you could list? It seems like a
> > more appropriate approach would be to allow some kind of user-space
> > hook or event notification to run upon module insertion, which could
> > then apply the appropriate sysctl.
> Btw, wanted to add some comments on the specific approach:
>
> 1. A ring hard-coded to 32 elements is IMO unuseable. While it may not
> be a real limit for what use case you have in mind, if it's in the
> kernel sooner or later someone else is going to use it and get
> bitten. Imagine if they wrote in 33 entries, and the first one was
> some critical security setting that ended up getting silently
> ignored...
Right.
> 2. On the other hand, allowing it to grow unbounded is equally
> unacceptable without a mechanism to list and clear the current
> "pending" sysctl values. Unfortunately, at this point, you're starting
> to violate "KISS".
Yep.
> Are the modules you refer to inserted during init at all? Because it
> seems like it would be a lot more appropriate to just move sysctl
> until after loading the modules, or perhaps running it again once they
> are loaded.
OK, lets step back a bit... sysctl(8) can be used to load other values, or
to change them, etc. Whatever is in sysctl.conf is just /default/ values,
/typically/ set on boot. You could let the initscripts set those, then
fiddle them by hand. If a module is now inserted, you can't just reset the
values to the ones in the file.
Perhaps module-specific values should be set in the configuration for the
module itself (i.e., arguments) or add to modprobe.conf something along
the lines:
sysctl mymod kernel.mystuff=42
and have modprobe(8) run sysctl(8) as needed after loading the module?
Sounds more KISSy to me...
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-02 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-01 14:49 Amit Gud
2006-08-01 15:25 ` Frederik Deweerdt
2006-08-01 16:56 ` Chase Venters
2006-08-01 17:22 ` Chase Venters
2006-08-01 19:04 ` Amit Gud
2006-08-01 20:36 ` Chase Venters
2006-08-02 14:56 ` Horst H. von Brand [this message]
2006-08-01 17:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-01 18:54 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608021456.k72EujBt007376@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl \
--to=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
--cc=agud@redhat.com \
--cc=chase.venters@clientec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®