From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] i386: annotate the rest of entry.s::nmi
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:39:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608101343_MC3-1-C7B1-9E81@compuserve.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44DB532F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:39:27 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> >> The point is that the push-es in FIX_STACK() aren't annotated, so
> >> things won't be correct at those points anyway.
> >
> >I have a patch here that adds that, but it won't compile
> >because that part of the NMI handler is un-annotated:
>
> But you didn't clarify why you need this piece of code annotated...
Uh, which one didn't I clarify?
FIX_STACK() is already invoked from debug(), which is annotated, but
FIX_STACK() isn't. And that messes with the stack, so for a few
instructions the annotations are all wrong.
When I annotated FIX_STACK(), I found entry.S wouldn't compile because
nmi() included FIX_STACK() but was completely missing annotations
in that piece. So I added them so FIX_STACK()'s annotations would
compile...
Should I send a combined patch, leave the two patches separate, or just
drop it?
--
Chuck
next reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-10 17:39 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2006-08-11 7:10 ` Jan Beulich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-11 23:13 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-14 6:55 ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-10 12:48 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-10 12:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-10 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-10 4:59 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-10 5:20 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-10 8:23 ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-10 8:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-10 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-11 17:46 ` Stas Sergeev
2006-08-14 6:52 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608101343_MC3-1-C7B1-9E81@compuserve.com \
--to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®