From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932736AbWHNWoN (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:44:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932737AbWHNWoM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:44:12 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:40592 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932736AbWHNWoM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:44:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:43:56 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: catalin.marinas@gmail.com Cc: Catalin Marinas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Antonino A. Daplas" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in vc_resize/vc_allocate Message-Id: <20060814154356.61fc89ca.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060810142221.31793.20635.stgit@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060810142221.31793.20635.stgit@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:21 +0100 Catalin Marinas wrote: > From: Catalin Marinas > > Memory leaks can happen in the vc_resize() function in drivers/char/vt.c > because of the vc->vc_screenbuf variable overriding in vc_allocate(). The > kmemleak reported trace is as follows: > > <__kmalloc> > > > > > > > > > This patch no longer allocates a screen buffer in vc_allocate() if it was > already allocated by vc_resize(). > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas > --- > > drivers/char/vt.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/vt.c b/drivers/char/vt.c > index da7e66a..31c8b32 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/vt.c > +++ b/drivers/char/vt.c > @@ -730,7 +730,8 @@ int vc_allocate(unsigned int currcons) / > visual_init(vc, currcons, 1); > if (!*vc->vc_uni_pagedir_loc) > con_set_default_unimap(vc); > - vc->vc_screenbuf = kmalloc(vc->vc_screenbuf_size, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!vc->vc_kmalloced) > + vc->vc_screenbuf = kmalloc(vc->vc_screenbuf_size, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!vc->vc_screenbuf) { > kfree(vc); > vc_cons[currcons].d = NULL; hm. Maybe. I'd worry that the memory at vc->vc_screenbuf isn't of the correct size and this patch will convert a leak into a buffer overrun. Also, what's up with this, in vc_resize()? if (vc->vc_kmalloced) kfree(vc->vc_screenbuf); vc->vc_screenbuf = newscreen; vc->vc_kmalloced = 1; if vc->vc_kmalloced means "there is kmalloced memory at vc->vc_screenbuf" then this is wrong. This code is all pretty twisty and I fear touching it.