From: Chris Rankin <rankincj@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:57:05 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060817075705.79729.qmail@web52908.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
> But maybe it's worth doing a user survey to find out what the users of
> 2.4 want... (and with that I mean users of the kernel.org 2.4 kernels,
> people who use enterprise distro kernels don't count for this since
> they'll not go to a newer released 2.4 anyway)
I have only one machine that is still running a v2.4 kernel (from ftp.kernel.org), and that is an
old P120 that I occasionally use as a wireless acess point.
The compiler on this P120 is indeed gcc-3.4. However, building any kernel on that machine is now
so excruciatingly painful that I am considering using a newer, beefier machine as a build machine
instead. That machine is running FC5, and so uses gcc-4.1. So from my perspective, being able to
build a 2.4 kernel using gcc-4.x would be a benefit.
Cheers,
Chris
____________________________________________________
Yahoo! Photos is now offering a quality print service from just 7p a photo. http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
next reply other threads:[~2006-08-17 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-17 7:57 Chris Rankin [this message]
2006-08-17 9:16 ` Thomas Backlund
2006-08-18 4:47 ` Willy Tarreau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-16 22:36 Willy Tarreau
2006-08-16 23:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 5:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-17 6:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-17 8:35 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2006-08-17 8:50 ` Mikael Pettersson
2006-08-17 12:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 20:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-17 23:41 ` Gerd v. Egidy
2006-08-18 4:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 0:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 9:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 9:16 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2006-08-18 23:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-19 1:20 ` Grant Coady
2006-08-20 17:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-19 4:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 0:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-21 0:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-21 1:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-17 8:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-08-17 9:12 ` Thomas Voegtle
2006-08-18 22:48 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-18 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-08-18 23:27 ` Solar Designer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060817075705.79729.qmail@web52908.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=rankincj@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome