From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci" <linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: fix ICH6 quirks
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:03:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060819000317.198c3c54.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608181921.31798.daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch>
> On Friday 18 August 2006 18.57, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > > [PATCH] PCI: fix ICH6 quirks
> > >
> > > - add the ICH6(R) LPC to the ICH6 ACPI quirks. currently only the ICH6-M is
> > > handled. [ PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_1 is the ICH6-M LPC, ICH6_0 is the ICH6(R) ]
> >
> > No objection.
> >
> > > - remove the wrong quirk calling asus_hides_smbus_lpc() for ICH6. the register
> > > modified in asus_hides_smbus_lpc() has a different meaning in ICH6.
> >
> > My mistake :( Thanks for fixing it. Do you know if executing the old
> > quirk on the ICH6 can cause trouble? In other words, should we backport
> > this fix to 2.6.17.y?
>
> the register it touches is part of the "root complex base address" register. so
> changing it means the ICH6 decodes a different address range that could conflict
> with something else...so yes, i think this is a 2.6.17.x candidate.
OK, this also means that we want your patch in 2.6.18. Greg, can you
pick it quickly?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-18 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-18 14:50 Daniel Ritz
2006-08-18 16:57 ` Jean Delvare
2006-08-18 17:21 ` Daniel Ritz
2006-08-18 22:03 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2006-08-21 18:25 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060819000317.198c3c54.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome