From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750778AbWHUTJZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:09:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750782AbWHUTJZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:09:25 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:33927 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750778AbWHUTJY (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:09:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:09:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20060821.120938.74556467.davem@davemloft.net> To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru Cc: bernd@firmix.at, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, zach.brown@oracle.com Subject: Re: [take9 1/2] kevent: Core files. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060821130121.GA2602@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20060821111335.GA8608@2ka.mipt.ru> <1156164805.17936.132.camel@tara.firmix.at> <20060821130121.GA2602@2ka.mipt.ru> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Evgeniy Polyakov Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:01:21 +0400 > Actually I completely do not care about define or enums, it is really > silly dispute, I just do not want to rewrite bunch of code _again_ and > then _again_ when someone decide that defines are better. I totally agree. What in the world is wrong with you people arguing over stuff like this? If the goal is to discourage Evgeniy and his work, you might just get your wish if you keep up with this silly coding style and enumeration crap! I can't even stand to read these kevent threads any longer, the sanity in them has long gone out the window.