From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] eCryptfs: Netlink functions for public key
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:54:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060824205419.c3894612.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060824181831.GB17658@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:18:32 -0500
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> eCryptfs netlink type, header updates, and messaging code to provide
> support for userspace callout to perform public key operations.
>
That tells us (with maximum terseness) what it does. We're left to our own
devices to work out why it does this, how it does it and why it does it in
the way in which it does it? This leads to dumb questions ;)
- We have a great clod of key mangement code in-kernel. Why is that not
suitable (or growable) for public key management?
- Is it appropriate that new infrastructure for public key management be
private to a particular fs?
- I see code in there in which the kernel "knows" about specific
userspace processes. By uid and pid. What's all that doing and why is
it done that way?
What happens if one of these daemons exits without sending a quit message?
- It uses netlink to transport keys. What are the security implications
of this? (Can they be sniffed, for example?)
- _why_ does it use netlink?
It's obvious that a string of design decisions have gone into all of this.
Please tell us about them. Please also tell us the answers to all the
other questions I'd have asked if I knew enough about this to ask them.
> * Author(s): Michael A. Halcrow <mahalcro@us.ibm.com>
> + * Trevor S. Highland <trevor.highland@gmail.com>
> + * Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@ou.edu>
Do we have signoffs from Trevor and Tyler?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-25 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 18:17 [PATCH 0/4] eCryptfs: Public key support Michael Halcrow
2006-08-24 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] eCryptfs: Netlink functions for public key Michael Halcrow
2006-08-25 3:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-08-25 19:18 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-08-28 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-24 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] eCryptfs: Public key header packets Michael Halcrow
2006-08-24 18:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] eCryptfs: Open-code flag manipulation Michael Halcrow
2006-08-24 18:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] eCryptfs: ino_t to u64 for filldir Michael Halcrow
2006-08-25 21:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] eCryptfs: Open-code flag manipulation David Howells
2006-08-25 21:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] eCryptfs: ino_t to u64 for filldir David Howells
2006-08-25 21:51 ` David Howells
2006-08-25 22:16 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-08-25 22:59 ` David Howells
2006-08-30 21:12 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-08-31 10:30 ` David Howells
2006-09-04 22:54 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-09-06 9:44 ` David Howells
2006-09-06 23:20 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-09-07 10:28 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060824205419.c3894612.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®