From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
Cc: Julio Auto <mindvortex@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread() retval check - 2.6.17.9
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:41:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060827214141.db40620d.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060828035556.GA27902@openwall.com>
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:55:56 +0400
Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:41:00AM -0300, Julio Auto wrote:
> > this is my porting (to 2.6.x) of the loop.c issue reported and patched
> > by Solar Designer, to whom all credits of the original idea to the
> > patch go (more info in the original "[PATCH] loop.c: kernel_thread()
> > retval check" e-mail thread).
>
> The patch looks good to me, although I did not test it.
>
> > Honestly, I couldn't test it on other computers, but mine. But the
> > tests were made against a stock (unmodified) 2.6.17.9 kernel and the
> > patch works like it should. Nevertheless, a second thought/review is
> > always appreciated.
>
> I think that testing this on a single machine is fine, but it is
> preferable that you also check for any resource leaks. That is, replace
> the kernel_thread() call with -EAGAIN, then run losetup in a loop and
> see whether the system possibly leaks a resource. I did apply this sort
> of testing to my original 2.4 patch.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Julio Auto <mindvortex@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
>
> > --- drivers/block/loop.c.orig 2006-08-23 11:44:51.000000000 -0700
> > +++ drivers/block/loop.c 2006-08-24 00:33:54.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -841,10 +841,20 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_devic
> >
> > error = kernel_thread(loop_thread, lo, CLONE_KERNEL);
> > if (error < 0)
> > - goto out_putf;
> > + goto out_clr;
> > wait_for_completion(&lo->lo_done);
> > return 0;
> >
> > + out_clr:
> > + lo->lo_device = NULL;
> > + lo->lo_flags = 0;
> > + lo->lo_backing_file = NULL;
> > + set_capacity(disks[lo->lo_number], 0);
> > + invalidate_bdev(bdev, 0);
> > + bd_set_size(bdev, 0);
> > + mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, lo->old_gfp_mask);
> > + lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
> > +
> > out_putf:
> > fput(file);
> > out:
>
The plan is to stop using the deprecated kernel_thread() in loop altogether.
Please review
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc4/2.6.18-rc4-mm3/broken-out/kthread-convert-loopc-to-kthread.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-28 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-24 6:41 Julio Auto
2006-08-28 3:55 ` Solar Designer
2006-08-28 4:41 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-08-28 5:03 ` Julio Auto
2006-08-28 12:50 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-08-28 4:52 ` Julio Auto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060827214141.db40620d.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mindvortex@gmail.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®