mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mikpe@it.uu.se
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG sparc64] 2.6.16-git6 broke X11 on Ultra5 with ATI Mach64
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:39:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060828.003908.68040612.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060731.224235.19784785.davem@davemloft.net>


Ok, I finally figured this one out and reproduced it on my
ultra5.

If, for example, we have a 4MB PTE and we do a write
we'll only update one of the 8KB sub-PTEs of that
mapping.

This is fine until that new mapping gets displaced from
the TLB and someone does a read that ends up hitting one
of the sub-PTEs that didn't get it's write-enable bit
set yet.

At this point we have a problem, because if a write is
made to the original address, the kernel says "the writable
bit is set, nothing to do".  So it won't flush the TLB,
and therefore it won't kick out the TLB mapping brought
in by the read.

So we just get wedged here until something displaces that
TLB entry.  This is why X acts sluggish and since it can
loop like this for quite a while the X server and the
hardware can get plenty confused.

The end result is that we have to make sure any PTE updates
propagate to all sub-PTEs of a large mapping during any
change.  That's really expensive and we'd have to add some
complex code to the set_pte_at() code path just to handle
this.

So the easiest way to fix this, without having to disable
largepage PTE mappings of I/O devices, is the patch below.
I will push this to Linus for 2.6.18 and -stable so that
2.6.17 gets it too.

commit 6ad7d29d2edd8c3d632e71454f619f5c0c6c2703
Author: David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon Aug 28 00:33:03 2006 -0700

    [SPARC64]: Fix X server hangs due to large pages.
    
    This problem was introduced by changeset
    14778d9072e53d2171f66ffd9657daff41acfaed
    
    Unlike the hugetlb code paths, the normal fault code is not setup to
    propagate PTE changes for large page sizes correctly like the ones we
    make for I/O mappings in io_remap_pfn_range().
    
    It is absolutely necessary to update all sub-ptes of a largepage
    mapping on a fault.  Adding special handling for this would add
    considerably complexity to tlb_batch_add().  So let's just side-step
    the issue and forcefully dirty any writable PTEs created by
    io_remap_pfn_range().
    
    The only other real option would be to disable to large PTE code of
    io_remap_pfn_range() and we really don't want to do that.
    
    Much thanks to Mikael Pettersson for tracking down this problem and
    testing debug patches.
    
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/arch/sparc64/mm/generic.c b/arch/sparc64/mm/generic.c
index 8cb0620..af9d81d 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/mm/generic.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/mm/generic.c
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ static inline void io_remap_pte_range(st
 		} else
 			offset += PAGE_SIZE;
 
+		if (pte_write(entry))
+			entry = pte_mkdirty(entry);
 		do {
 			BUG_ON(!pte_none(*pte));
 			set_pte_at(mm, address, pte, entry);

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-28  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-28 10:35 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-28 11:13 ` David Miller
2006-08-01  5:42 ` David Miller
2006-08-28  7:39   ` David Miller [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-28 21:18 Mikael Pettersson
2006-08-06 21:09 Mikael Pettersson
2006-08-06 23:37 ` David Miller
2006-08-01 11:30 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-06  9:37 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-07  7:05 ` David Miller
2006-07-28  1:13   ` David Miller
2006-07-28  3:38     ` David Miller
2006-07-04 10:03 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-03 11:17 Mikael Pettersson
2006-07-04  7:41 ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-04  9:32   ` Rene Rebe
2006-07-06  3:40 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060828.003908.68040612.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome