From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932118AbWH1JJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:09:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932341AbWH1JJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:09:43 -0400 Received: from liaag1af.mx.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.32]:47035 "EHLO liaag1af.mx.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932118AbWH1JJm (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:09:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:06:02 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Implement per-processor data areas for i386. To: Andreas Mohr Cc: Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Jan Beulich , Zachary Amsden , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200608280508_MC3-1-C992-B62D@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060827172155.GA21724@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:21:55 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Something like that had to be done eventually about the inefficient > current_thread_info() mechanism, but I wasn't sure what exactly. In 2.6.18 it's done in C and the optimizer does a pretty good job with it in recent compilers. -- Chuck