mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] RCU: use a separate softirq
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:13:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060831011348.GB2961@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060828161112.GD3325@in.ibm.com>

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:41:12PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> 
> Finally, RCU gets its own softirq. With it being used extensively,
> the per-cpu tasklet used earlier was just a softirq with overheads.
> This makes things more efficient.

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
> 
>  include/linux/interrupt.h |    3 ++-
>  kernel/rcuclassic.c       |   12 +++++-------
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq kernel/rcuclassic.c
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu/kernel/rcuclassic.c~rcu-softirq	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu-dipankar/kernel/rcuclassic.c	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data) = { 0L };
>  
>  /* Fake initialization required by compiler */
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, rcu_tasklet) = {NULL};
>  static int blimit = 10;
>  static int qhimark = 10000;
>  static int qlowmark = 100;
> @@ -212,7 +211,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data
>  	if (!rdp->donelist)
>  		rdp->donetail = &rdp->donelist;
>  	else
> -		tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, rdp->cpu));
> +		raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -363,7 +362,6 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
>  					&per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
>  	put_cpu_var(rcu_data);
>  	put_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data);
> -	tasklet_kill_immediate(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), cpu);
>  }
>  
>  #else
> @@ -375,7 +373,7 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> - * This does the RCU processing work from tasklet context. 
> + * This does the RCU processing work from softirq context. 
>   */
>  static void __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
>  					struct rcu_data *rdp)
> @@ -420,7 +418,7 @@ static void __rcu_process_callbacks(stru
>  		rcu_do_batch(rdp);
>  }
>  
> -static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsigned long unused)
> +static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
>  {
>  	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_data));
>  	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data));
> @@ -484,7 +482,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int us
>  		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
>  	} else if (!in_softirq())
>  		rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
> -	tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu));
> +	raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
>  }
>  
>  static void rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
> @@ -507,7 +505,7 @@ static void __devinit rcu_online_cpu(int
>  
>  	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_ctrlblk, rdp);
>  	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_bh_ctrlblk, bh_rdp);
> -	tasklet_init(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu), rcu_process_callbacks, 0UL);
> +	open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks, NULL);
>  }
>  
>  static int __devinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> diff -puN include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq include/linux/interrupt.h
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu/include/linux/interrupt.h~rcu-softirq	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-rcu-dipankar/include/linux/interrupt.h	2006-08-27 01:01:15.000000000 +0530
> @@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ enum
>  	NET_TX_SOFTIRQ,
>  	NET_RX_SOFTIRQ,
>  	BLOCK_SOFTIRQ,
> -	TASKLET_SOFTIRQ
> +	TASKLET_SOFTIRQ,
> +	RCU_SOFTIRQ	/* Preferable RCU should always be the last softirq */
>  };
>  
>  /* softirq mask and active fields moved to irq_cpustat_t in
> 
> _

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-31  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-28 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] RCU: split classic rcu Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-31  1:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-08-28 16:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] RCU: use a separate softirq Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-31  1:13   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2006-08-28 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] RCU: preemptible RCU implementation Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 20:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-29  1:33     ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] RCU: clean up RCU trace Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:15 ` [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28 16:29   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 16:33     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-28 16:43       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-28 19:16   ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-28 19:40     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-29  0:23       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-08-29  0:28         ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-30  0:40       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060831011348.GB2961@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome