From: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ak@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org, okuji@enbug.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
Subject: [patch 2/6] fault-injection capability for kmalloc.
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:07:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060831100820.467385110@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060831100756.866727476@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: failslab.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2972 bytes --]
This patch provides fault-injection capability for kmalloc.
Boot option:
failslab=<probability>,<interval>,<times>,<space>
<probability>
specifies how often it should fail in percent.
<interval>
specifies the interval of failures.
<times>
specifies how many times failures may happen at most.
<space>
specifies the size of free space where memory can be allocated
safely in bytes.
Example:
failslab=100,10,-1,0
slab allocation (kmalloc, kmem_cache_alloc,..) fails once per 10 times.
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
include/linux/should_fail.h | 4 ++++
lib/Kconfig.debug | 7 +++++++
mm/slab.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
Index: work-shouldfail/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- work-shouldfail.orig/mm/slab.c
+++ work-shouldfail/mm/slab.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/rtmutex.h>
+#include <linux/should_fail.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
@@ -2963,11 +2964,31 @@ static void *cache_alloc_debugcheck_afte
#define cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(a,b,objp,d) (objp)
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAILSLAB
+
+static DEFINE_SHOULD_FAIL(failslab_data);
+
+static int __init setup_failslab(char *str)
+{
+ should_fail_srandom(jiffies);
+ return setup_should_fail(&failslab_data, str);
+}
+__setup("failslab=", setup_failslab);
+
+struct should_fail_data *failslab = &failslab_data;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(failslab);
+
+#endif
+
static inline void *____cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags)
{
void *objp;
struct array_cache *ac;
+ if (!(flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && cachep != &cache_cache &&
+ should_fail(failslab, obj_size(cachep)))
+ return NULL;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
if (unlikely(current->flags & (PF_SPREAD_SLAB | PF_MEMPOLICY))) {
objp = alternate_node_alloc(cachep, flags);
Index: work-shouldfail/lib/Kconfig.debug
===================================================================
--- work-shouldfail.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ work-shouldfail/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -372,3 +372,10 @@ config RCU_TORTURE_TEST
config SHOULD_FAIL
bool
+config FAILSLAB
+ bool "fault-injection capabilitiy for kmalloc"
+ depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
+ select SHOULD_FAIL
+ help
+ This option provides fault-injection capabilitiy for kmalloc.
+
Index: work-shouldfail/include/linux/should_fail.h
===================================================================
--- work-shouldfail.orig/include/linux/should_fail.h
+++ work-shouldfail/include/linux/should_fail.h
@@ -36,6 +36,10 @@ int setup_should_fail(struct should_fail
void should_fail_srandom(unsigned long entropy);
int should_fail(struct should_fail_data *data, ssize_t size);
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAILSLAB
+extern struct should_fail_data *failslab;
+#endif
+
#else
#define should_fail(data, size) (0)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-31 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-31 10:07 [patch 0/6] RFC: fault-injection capabilities (v2) Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:07 ` [patch 1/6] fault-injection capabilities infrastructure Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-31 10:07 ` Akinobu Mita [this message]
2006-08-31 10:07 ` [patch 3/6] fault-injection capability for alloc_pages() Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-31 10:35 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:45 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-31 10:08 ` [patch 4/6] fault-injection capability for disk IO Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:08 ` [patch 5/6] debugfs entries for configuration Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 10:08 ` [patch 6/6] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities Akinobu Mita
2006-08-31 17:29 ` [patch 0/6] RFC: fault-injection capabilities (v2) Josh Triplett
2006-08-31 18:31 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060831100820.467385110@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mita@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okuji@enbug.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome