mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 2/2] fs/xfs: Converting into generic boolean
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:02:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060904150241.I3335706@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44F833C9.1000208@student.ltu.se>; from ricknu-0@student.ltu.se on Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:21:13PM +0200

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:21:13PM +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> From: Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>
> 
> Converting:
> 'B_FALSE' into 'false'
> 'B_TRUE'  into 'true'
> 'boolean_t' into 'bool'

Hmm, so your bool is better than the next guys bool[ean[_t]]? :)

Seems like it'll be a few more days until the next cleanup patch
to remove _that_, so we shouldn't go that path.  Since we do use
the current boolean_t somewhat inconsistently in XFS, I'd say we
should just toss the thing and use int.

I took the earlier patch and completed it, switching over to int
use in place of boolean_t in the few places it used - I'll merge
that at some point, when its had enough testing.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.496999

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-04  5:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-01 13:21 Richard Knutsson
2006-09-04  5:02 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2006-09-04 10:24   ` Richard Knutsson
2006-09-05  3:05     ` Nathan Scott
2006-09-05 12:47       ` Richard Knutsson
2006-09-05 23:14         ` [xfs-masters] " Nathan Scott
2006-09-06  0:23           ` Richard Knutsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060904150241.I3335706@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
    --to=nathans@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®