From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Subject: [patch] lockdep core: improve the lock-chain-hash
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:16:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906111601.GA23826@elte.hu> (raw)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
With CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC turned off i was getting sporadic
failures in the locking self-test:
------------>
| Locking API testsuite:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-B-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-B-C-C-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-C-A-B-C deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-B-C-C-D-D-A deadlock: ok |FAILED| ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-C-D-B-D-D-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
A-B-C-D-B-C-D-A deadlock: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |FAILED|
after much debugging it turned out to be caused by accidental chain-hash
key collisions. The current hash is:
#define iterate_chain_key(key1, key2) \
(((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2) ^ \
((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2)) ^ \
(key2))
where MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS is 11. This hash is pretty good as it will
shift by 5 bits in every iteration, where every new ID 'mixed' into the
hash would have up to 11 bits. But because there was a 6 bits overlap
between subsequent IDs and their high bits tended to be similar, there
was a chance for accidental chain-hash collision for a low number of
locks held.
the solution is to shift by 11 bits:
#define iterate_chain_key(key1, key2) \
(((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS) ^ \
((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS)) ^ \
(key2))
This keeps the hash perfect up to 5 locks held, but even above that the
hash is still good because 11 bits is a relative prime to the total 64
bits, so a complete match will only occur after 64 held locks (which
doesnt happen in Linux). Even after 5 locks held, entropy of the 5 IDs
mixed into the hash is already good enough so that overlap doesnt
generate a colliding hash ID.
which this change the false positives went away.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ static struct list_head chainhash_table[
* unique.
*/
#define iterate_chain_key(key1, key2) \
- (((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2) ^ \
- ((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2)) ^ \
+ (((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS) ^ \
+ ((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS)) ^ \
(key2))
void lockdep_off(void)
reply other threads:[~2006-09-06 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060906111601.GA23826@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®