mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Subject: [patch] lockdep core: improve the lock-chain-hash
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:16:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060906111601.GA23826@elte.hu> (raw)

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

With CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC turned off i was getting sporadic
failures in the locking self-test:

------------>
| Locking API testsuite:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     A-A deadlock:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
                 A-B-B-A deadlock:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
             A-B-B-C-C-A deadlock:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
             A-B-C-A-B-C deadlock:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
         A-B-B-C-C-D-D-A deadlock:  ok  |FAILED|  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
         A-B-C-D-B-D-D-A deadlock:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
         A-B-C-D-B-C-D-A deadlock:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |FAILED|

after much debugging it turned out to be caused by accidental chain-hash
key collisions. The current hash is:

 #define iterate_chain_key(key1, key2) \
	(((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2) ^ \
	((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2)) ^ \
 	(key2))

where MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS is 11. This hash is pretty good as it will
shift by 5 bits in every iteration, where every new ID 'mixed' into the
hash would have up to 11 bits. But because there was a 6 bits overlap
between subsequent IDs and their high bits tended to be similar, there
was a chance for accidental chain-hash collision for a low number of
locks held.

the solution is to shift by 11 bits:

 #define iterate_chain_key(key1, key2) \
	(((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS) ^ \
	((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS)) ^ \
 	(key2))

This keeps the hash perfect up to 5 locks held, but even above that the
hash is still good because 11 bits is a relative prime to the total 64
bits, so a complete match will only occur after 64 held locks (which
doesnt happen in Linux). Even after 5 locks held, entropy of the 5 IDs
mixed into the hash is already good enough so that overlap doesnt
generate a colliding hash ID.

which this change the false positives went away.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

---
 kernel/lockdep.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ static struct list_head chainhash_table[
  * unique.
  */
 #define iterate_chain_key(key1, key2) \
-	(((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2) ^ \
-	((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS/2)) ^ \
+	(((key1) << MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS) ^ \
+	((key1) >> (64-MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS_BITS)) ^ \
 	(key2))
 
 void lockdep_off(void)

                 reply	other threads:[~2006-09-06 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060906111601.GA23826@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®