From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751890AbWIGVfo (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:35:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751892AbWIGVfn (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:35:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:9169 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890AbWIGVfm (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:35:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:35:13 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: James Cross Cc: Jens Axboe , Andries Brouwer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix /proc/partitions oops Message-Id: <20060907143513.7024c15c.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 17:04:20 +0100 (BST) James Cross wrote: > If show_partition happens to race with re-reading a partition table > (rescan_partitions), sgp->part[n] can become NULL just after it's been > tested, and so cause an oops: read it once (and read nr_sects just the > once too, to avoid a chance of showing 0). > OK. > > block/genhd.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > --- 2.6.18-rc6/block/genhd.c.orig 2006-09-07 12:14:32.183218000 +0100 > +++ 2.6.18-rc6/block/genhd.c 2006-09-07 12:15:16.134498000 +0100 > @@ -261,14 +261,18 @@ static int show_partition(struct seq_fil > (unsigned long long)get_capacity(sgp) >> 1, > disk_name(sgp, 0, buf)); > for (n = 0; n < sgp->minors - 1; n++) { > - if (!sgp->part[n]) > + struct hd_struct *partn; > + unsigned long long nr_sects; > + > + partn = sgp->part[n]; > + if (!partn) > continue; > - if (sgp->part[n]->nr_sects == 0) > + nr_sects = partn->nr_sects; > + if (nr_sects == 0) > continue; > seq_printf(part, "%4d %4d %10llu %s\n", > sgp->major, n + 1 + sgp->first_minor, > - (unsigned long long)sgp->part[n]->nr_sects >> 1 , > - disk_name(sgp, n + 1, buf)); > + nr_sects >> 1, disk_name(sgp, n + 1, buf)); > } > > return 0; But that'll leave us reading possibly-freed memory. I expect the correct way to fix this is with locking: the /proc/partitions reading code needs to lock down the partition information while it's reading it. AFAICT the appropriate lock to take is the bdev->bd_mutex on the blockdev which represents the "whole" disk. But I'm not sure whether that's correct, nor what the official way is of hunting down that block_device*, nor whether the code in do_open() is managing to take the correct lock. Cc's hopefully added.