From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965281AbWIJGSa (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:18:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965282AbWIJGSa (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:18:30 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:39175 "EHLO mail.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965281AbWIJGSa (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:18:30 -0400 Date: 10 Sep 2006 08:18:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:18:28 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386-pda updates Message-ID: <20060910061828.GB12564@muc.de> References: <45027822.2010906@goop.org> <20060909155257.GA50136@muc.de> <45034E97.9090109@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45034E97.9090109@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 04:30:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >>@@ -20,7 +22,14 @@ extern struct i386_pda _proxy_pda; > >>#define pda_to_op(op,field,val) \ > >> do { \ > >> typedef typeof(_proxy_pda.field) T__; \ > >>+ if (0) { T__ tmp__; tmp__ = (val); } \ > >> > > > >Merged into original patch > > > BTW, do you mean you already had this in i386, or that you folded it > into the existing patch? I don't think I had sent out my version of > this before. I folded it into the existing patch. -Andi