From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@kvack.org>,
kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] FRV: Permit __do_IRQ() to be dispensed with
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:33:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911053320.GB11269@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157898878.3516.2.camel@c-67-169-176-11.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 07:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > The real solution would be to use gcc -ffunction-sections plus ld
> > --gc-sections to automatically get rid of unused global functions, at
> > link time. I'm wondering how hard it would be to enhance kbuild to do
> > that - x86_64 already uses -ffunction-sections (if CONFIG_REORDER), so
> > the big question is how usable is ld --gc-sections. Such a feature would
> > be quite important for embedded systems (and for RAM footprint in
> > general) as it would save a significant amount of .text and .data.
>
> A patch to do this was submitted already by Marcelo Tosatti ..
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/4/169
ah, i missed that patch in the June lock validator frenzy. The results
are astounding:
>> vmlinux shrinks from 1090389 to 983933 bytes, or 106k (~= 10%).
Andrew, Linus, Kai, Sam: a must-have feature! This saves more kernel
kernel image RAM than all the other kernel shrinking efforts of the past
2 years combined - at zero cost.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-08 15:32 [PATCH 1/3] FRV: Improve FRV's use of generic IRQ handling David Howells
2006-09-08 15:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] FRV: Permit __do_IRQ() to be dispensed with David Howells
2006-09-09 5:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-09-09 7:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-10 14:34 ` Daniel Walker
2006-09-11 5:33 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-09-21 13:12 ` David Howells
2006-09-21 21:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-11 9:47 ` David Howells
2006-09-11 15:33 ` Daniel Walker
2006-09-08 15:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] FRV: Mark __do_IRQ() deprecated David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060911053320.GB11269@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=kai@germaschewski.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®