mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:37:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911083734.GA25953@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609091252070.26746@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:56:16PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> > > one or more, it is unnecessary for the common case.
> > 
> > The common case is an arch with much less cpus. The maxinum on i386
> > f.e. is 255 meaning 8 bytes. That fits in the cacheline that is already
> > used for the stack frame of the calling function. 
> 
> Ughh. Wrong. 255 cpus require 32 bytes. System rarely have that 
> much. If you configure a kernel with less than 32 cpus then this will be 
> one word on the stack.
> 
> Also note that the patch restricts the search to online cpus. The 
> scheduler will check offline cpus without this patch. That may actually 
> result in speed improvements since the cachelines from offline cpus are
> no longer brought in during the search for the busiest group / cpu.

This should not be the case. The sched-domain structure should always
reflect the online CPUs only (see our hotplug cpu handler), and if you
find otherwise then that would be a bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-11  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-06 23:38 Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 10:58 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-07 15:29   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 17:24   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 21:47     ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-07 22:20       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 22:32         ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-08  2:52           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-08 17:35 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-08 18:40   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-08 20:00     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-08 20:19       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-09  0:03         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-09  5:25           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-09 19:56             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-11  8:37               ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-09-12 18:37                 ` [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler V2 Christoph Lameter
2006-09-15  0:26                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-15  9:44                     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060911083734.GA25953@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome