From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964945AbWIWAGg (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:06:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964942AbWIWAGg (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:06:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:35250 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964940AbWIWAGf (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:06:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:06:04 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "tony.luck@intel.com" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , GOTO Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] cpu to node relationship fixup take2 [1/2] acpi_map_cpu2node Message-Id: <20060922170604.745d662a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060922152447.42a83860.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20060922152447.42a83860.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:24:47 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > I rewrote the whoe patch.. > Well I don't recall ever having seen a "cpu to node relationship fixup take1" and I have generally lost the plot regarding these fixes. What I have now is: cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-take2.patch cpu-to-node-relationship-fixup-map-cpu-to-node.patch I shall send those patches in reply to this email. Please confirm that these are correct, sufficient, complete, etc. Do you believe these are needed in 2.6.18.x? Please follow the guidelines in http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt a little more closely, especially regarding Subject:s Please bear in mind that I'm sitting on thousands of patches from hundreds of developers, that I process sometimes hundreds of patches per day and I am very easily confused. Retaining consistent and well-thought out Subject:s and referring to previous patches via their precise Subject:s really helps, thanks.