From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965438AbWI0Iyj (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:54:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750902AbWI0Iyj (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:54:39 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:946 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750890AbWI0Iyj (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:54:39 -0400 From: Paul Jackson To: Andrew Morton Cc: Greg Banks , Paul Jackson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:54:29 -0700 Message-Id: <20060927085429.32218.64893.sendpatchset@sam.engr.sgi.com> Subject: [PATCH] cpumask add highest_possible_node_id fix Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fix typo in lib/cpumask.c - looks like a cut+paste forgot to change a cpu macro call to a node macro call. This typo caused the following build warnings: lib/cpumask.c: In function `highest_possible_node_id': lib/cpumask.c:56: warning: passing arg 1 of `__first_cpu' from incompatible pointer type lib/cpumask.c:56: warning: passing arg 2 of `__next_cpu' from incompatible pointer type Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson --- lib/cpumask.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- 2.6.18-rc7-mm1.orig/lib/cpumask.c 2006-09-26 16:25:57.000000000 -0700 +++ 2.6.18-rc7-mm1/lib/cpumask.c 2006-09-27 01:38:17.000000000 -0700 @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int highest_possible_node_id(void) unsigned int node; unsigned int highest = 0; - for_each_cpu_mask(node, node_possible_map) + for_each_node_mask(node, node_possible_map) highest = node; return highest; } -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401