From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932319AbWI2LrM (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:47:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932318AbWI2LrM (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:47:12 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:4615 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161033AbWI2LrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:47:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:36:52 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PCI bridge missing Message-ID: <20060929113651.GA5955@sirena.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200609281624.16082.luke@dashjr.org> <1159485255.13029.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200609290017.34412.luke@dashjr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609290017.34412.luke@dashjr.org> X-Cookie: Every morning is a Smirnoff morning. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:17:32AM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Thursday 28 September 2006 21:39, you wrote: > > so if there is some custom "enabler" driver in the Windows for it that might > > explain problems. > Some old Debian (2.2) manual at least implied it worked at one point. That's > where I compared the lspci from. So this would be a regression, a hardware > failure, or a misconfiguration. I've used some of these boxes - they've always worked just fine in the past, though I've not tried anything more current than earlyish 2.6 kernels I think. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."