From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org, rossb@google.com, akpm@google.com,
sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: [patch 024/144] allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:52:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061001115241.fb9dc96d.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061001113600.3c318eda.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:36:00 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 09:39:54 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:27:25 -0700 akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> >
> > > From: Ross Biro <rossb@google.com>
> > >
> > > The driver for /proc/config.gz consumes rather a lot of memory and it is in
> > > fact possible to build it as a module.
> > >
> > > In some ways this is a bit risky, because the .config which is used for
> > > compiling kernel/configs.c isn't necessarily the same as the .config which was
> > > used to build vmlinux.
> > >
> > > But OTOH the potential memory savings are decent, and it'd be fairly dumb to
> > > build your configs.o with a different .config.
> >
> > so after getting several disagreements on this, you are going ahead
> > with it.
>
> Actually I had this mentally tagged as "needs more arguing before merging"
> but then forgot and went and sent it anyway.
Well, we agree on that part at least.
> So now it's in the "needs more arguing before we revert it" category.
Wrong order IMO.
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-01 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200610010627.k916RPIs010370@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-10-01 16:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-01 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-01 18:52 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2006-10-02 14:09 ` Ross Biro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061001115241.fb9dc96d.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=akpm@google.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rossb@google.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®