From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932641AbWJFWGr (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:06:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932642AbWJFWGr (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:06:47 -0400 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:52437 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932641AbWJFWGq (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:06:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:06:33 -0400 To: NeilBrown Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg Banks , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] knfsd: Tidyup up meaning of 'buffer size' in nfsd/sunrpc Message-ID: <20061006220633.GE18026@fieldses.org> References: <20061005171043.4544.patches@notabene> <1061005071212.6527@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1061005071212.6527@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:12:12PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > Ok, this patch should fix up the remaining issue with a recent > set of NFSD patches. It has been reviewed by Greg, and I'm convinced:-) It's working for me, thanks.--b.