From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750762AbWJLUyi (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:54:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750766AbWJLUyi (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:54:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:31662 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750762AbWJLUyi (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:54:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:54:28 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Josef "Jeff" Sipek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 23][-mm] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem Message-Id: <20061012135428.024d0d33.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:18:37 -0400 Josef "Jeff" Sipek wrote: > This set of patches constitutes Unionfs version 2.0. So we need to get this reviewed. Christoph and I are pretty much the only people who do filesystem reviewing, despite the fact that we have hoards of filesystem developers out there busily doing their own stuff (and that includes the unionfs developers, I might add). Our review-to-development ratio is wildly out of whack and I don't know how to fix that. Meanwhile, from a quick scan I'd say that unionfs is much, much too lightly commented for a review to be particularly effective. Please work on that.