mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1] radeonfb: check return value of sysfs_create_bin_file
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:05:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061012160553.GA7382@dreamland.darkstar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jey7rlo7g0.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

Il Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:54:55PM +0200, Andreas Schwab ha scritto: 
> Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Il Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:07:26AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt ha scritto: 
> >> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 01:53 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> >> > sysfs_create_bin_file() is marked as warn_unused_result but we don't
> >> > actually check the return value.
> >> > Error is not fatal, the driver can operate fine without the files so
> >> > just print a notice on failure.
> >> 
> >> I find this whole business of must check return value for sysfs files to
> >> be gratuitous bloat. There are many cases (like this one) where we don't
> >> really care and a printk will just increase the kernel size for no good
> >> reason.
> >> 
> >> Maybe we can have a macro we can use to silence the warning when we
> >> don't care about the result ? Can gcc do that ?
> >
> > Ugly macro:
> >
> > #define UNCHECKED(func) do { if (func) {} } while(0)
> 
> Better, but only marginally:
> 
> #define UNCHECKED(func) (void)(func)

Nope, I tried[1] before sending the mail ;) warn_unused_result requires
that you _use_ the result.

Luca
[1] kronos:~$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061007 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-16)
-- 
"It is more complicated than you think"
                -- The Eighth Networking Truth from RFC 1925

      reply	other threads:[~2006-10-12 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-11 23:53 Luca Tettamanti
2006-10-12  0:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-12 15:45   ` Luca Tettamanti
2006-10-12 15:54     ` Andreas Schwab
2006-10-12 16:05       ` Luca Tettamanti [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061012160553.GA7382@dreamland.darkstar.lan \
    --to=kronos.it@gmail.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®