From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751265AbWJLWsN (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:48:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751275AbWJLWsM (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:48:12 -0400 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:50895 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274AbWJLWsL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:48:11 -0400 From: Roman Zippel To: "Robert P. J. Day" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Redefine instances of sema_init() to use standard form. Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:47:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610130047.58507.zippel@linux-m68k.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thursday 12 October 2006 09:44, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > Since there seems to be no compelling reason *not* to do this, [..] > - /* > - * Logically, > - * *sem = (struct semaphore)__SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER((*sem),val); > - * except that gcc produces better initializing by parts yet. > - */ You've seen this? bye, Roman