mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: bijwaard@gmail.com
Cc: "Dennis J.A. Bijwaard" <dennis@h8922032063.dsl.speedlinq.nl>,
	sct@redhat.com, adilger@clusterfs.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! in sys_close and ext3
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:12:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061015121202.378bdd41.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061015175640.GA3673@jumbo.lan>

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:56:40 +0200
"Dennis J.A. Bijwaard" <dennis@h8922032063.dsl.speedlinq.nl> wrote:

> I got two soft lockups on one of the CPUs just now. I'm unsure if this
> problem is in ext3, sys_close, or general kernel, so I've CC'd the
> kernel list.
> 
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
> 
> BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! in sys_close/fput and ext3 journaling

Both warnings occurred when the kernel was tearing down large amounts of
pagecache via invalidate_inode_pages().  One instances was a blockdev
(probably the final close on the dvd) and the other was a regular file
(perhaps a large dvd image?)

The CPU is slow: 500MHz pIII.  How much memory does it have?

So the kernel was doing a lot of work, on a slow CPU.  Perhaps that simply
exceeded the softlockup timeout.  If that's true then the machine should
have recovered.  Once it did, and once it didn't.  I don't know why it
didn't.



  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-15 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-15 17:56 Dennis J.A. Bijwaard
2006-10-15 19:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-10-15 21:58   ` Dennis J.A. Bijwaard
2006-11-14  9:58     ` CaT
2006-11-14 10:01       ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-14 23:29         ` CaT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061015121202.378bdd41.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=bijwaard@gmail.com \
    --cc=dennis@h8922032063.dsl.speedlinq.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®