From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AIO, DIO fsx tests failures on 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:59:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061016135910.be11a2dc.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161031099.32606.14.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:38:19 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > So the answer is that -rc1-mm1 doesn't quite have the most recent
> > version of this patch. Grab the final patch at the end of this post
> > from Andrew:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/11/234
> >
> > It fixes up a misunderstanding that came from
> > generic_file_buffered_write()'s habit of adding its 'written' input into
> > the amount of bytes it announces having written in its return value.
> >
> > From mm-commits it looks like -mm2 will have the full patch.
> >
>
> Hmm.. with that patch applied, I still have fsx failures.
> This time read() returning -EINVAL. Are there any other fixes
> missing in -mm ?
Probably. I need to get off butt and prepare rc2-mm1.
The below is the full patch against 2.6.19-rc2. Please test this version.
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
When direct-io falls back to buffered write, it will just leave the dirty data
floating about in pagecache, pending regular writeback.
But normal direct-io semantics are that IO is synchronous, and that it leaves
no pagecache behind.
So change the fallback-to-buffered-write code to sync the file region and to
then strip away the pagecache, just as a regular direct-io write would do.
Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---
mm/filemap.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/filemap.c~direct-io-sync-and-invalidate-file-region-when-falling-back-to-buffered-write mm/filemap.c
--- a/mm/filemap.c~direct-io-sync-and-invalidate-file-region-when-falling-back-to-buffered-write
+++ a/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2222,7 +2222,7 @@ __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(struct k
unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t *ppos)
{
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
- const struct address_space * mapping = file->f_mapping;
+ struct address_space * mapping = file->f_mapping;
size_t ocount; /* original count */
size_t count; /* after file limit checks */
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
@@ -2275,8 +2275,11 @@ __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(struct k
/* coalesce the iovecs and go direct-to-BIO for O_DIRECT */
if (unlikely(file->f_flags & O_DIRECT)) {
- written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, iov,
- &nr_segs, pos, ppos, count, ocount);
+ loff_t endbyte;
+ ssize_t written_buffered;
+
+ written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, iov, &nr_segs, pos,
+ ppos, count, ocount);
if (written < 0 || written == count)
goto out;
/*
@@ -2285,10 +2288,46 @@ __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(struct k
*/
pos += written;
count -= written;
- }
+ written_buffered = generic_file_buffered_write(iocb, iov,
+ nr_segs, pos, ppos, count,
+ written);
+ /*
+ * If generic_file_buffered_write() retuned a synchronous error
+ * then we want to return the number of bytes which were
+ * direct-written, or the error code if that was zero. Note
+ * that this differs from normal direct-io semantics, which
+ * will return -EFOO even if some bytes were written.
+ */
+ if (written_buffered < 0) {
+ err = written_buffered;
+ goto out;
+ }
- written = generic_file_buffered_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs,
- pos, ppos, count, written);
+ /*
+ * We need to ensure that the page cache pages are written to
+ * disk and invalidated to preserve the expected O_DIRECT
+ * semantics.
+ */
+ endbyte = pos + written_buffered - written - 1;
+ err = do_sync_file_range(file, pos, endbyte,
+ SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_BEFORE|
+ SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE|
+ SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_AFTER);
+ if (err == 0) {
+ written = written_buffered;
+ invalidate_mapping_pages(mapping,
+ pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT,
+ endbyte >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * We don't know how much we wrote, so just return
+ * the number of bytes which were direct-written
+ */
+ }
+ } else {
+ written = generic_file_buffered_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs,
+ pos, ppos, count, written);
+ }
out:
current->backing_dev_info = NULL;
return written ? written : err;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-16 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-16 15:42 Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 17:51 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-16 17:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 20:13 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-16 20:38 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-16 20:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-10-16 21:21 ` Zach Brown
2006-10-17 22:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-17 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-17 23:38 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-18 15:44 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061016135910.be11a2dc.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®