From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422863AbWJTE74 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:59:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161434AbWJTE74 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:59:56 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:55747 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161413AbWJTE7z (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:59:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:59:54 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor fixes to generic do_div Message-Id: <20061019215954.1be82a57.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061020033359.GR2602@parisc-linux.org> References: <20061020033359.GR2602@parisc-linux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:34:00 -0600 Matthew Wilcox wrote: > +/* The unnecessary pointer compare is there > + * to check for type safety (n must be 64bit) > + */ > +# define do_div(n,base) ({ \ > + uint32_t __base = (base); \ > + uint32_t __rem; \ > + (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \ > + __rem = ((uint64_t)(n)) % __base; \ > + (n) = ((uint64_t)(n)) / __base; \ > + __rem; \ > }) Can we use typecheck(), from include/linux/kernel.h?