From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated.
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:42:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061025084226.GN5851@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161764907.22729.86.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Hi!
> > > With the code I have in Suspend2 (which is what I'm working towards),
> > > the value includes the swap_type, so there's no overlap. Assuming the
> > > swap allocator does it's normal thing and swap allocated is contiguous,
> > > you'll probably end up with two extents: one containing the swap
> > > allocated on the first device, and the other containing the swap
> > > allocated on the second device. So (with the current version), striping
> > > would use 6 * sizeof(unsigned long) instead of 3 * sizeof(unsigned
> > > long).
> >
> > And now, can you do same computation assuming the swap allocator goes
> > completely crazy, and free space is in 1-page chunks?
>
> The worst case is 3 * sizeof(unsigned long) *
> number_of_swap_extents_allocated bytes.
Okay, so if we got 4GB of swap space, thats 1MB swap pages, worst case
is you have one extent per page, on x86-64 that's 24MB. +kmalloc
overhead, I assume?
And you do linear walks over those extents, leading to O(n^2)
algorithm, no? That has bitten us before...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-25 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-23 4:14 Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-23 15:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-23 23:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 8:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 8:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 8:42 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-10-25 9:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 9:10 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-25 10:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 12:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-27 11:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-10-24 22:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 23:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-31 11:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 20:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-24 22:06 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-24 22:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-24 23:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 9:17 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-25 10:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-10-25 10:20 ` Jens Axboe
2006-10-31 11:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-11-01 12:36 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-01 21:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061025084226.GN5851@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®