From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161008AbWJ3FQU (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:16:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161018AbWJ3FQU (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:16:20 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:58278 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161008AbWJ3FQT (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:16:19 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:16:04 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Greg KH Cc: Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc3-mm1 Message-Id: <20061029211604.41114b13.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061030035430.GA4045@kroah.com> References: <20061029160002.29bb2ea1.akpm@osdl.org> <20061030025000.GA8896@redhat.com> <20061030035430.GA4045@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:54:30 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 09:50:00PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:00:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > - For some reason Greg has resurrected the patches which detect whether > > > you're using old versions of udev and if so, punish you for it. > > > > > > If weird stuff happens, try upgrading udev. > > > > Where "old" is how old exactly ? > > As per the Kconfig help entry, any version of udev released before 2006 > will probably have problems with the new config option. So follow the > text and enable the option if you are running an old version of udev and > you should be fine. Greg is referring to CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED. I didn't know it existed. If I had known I'd have saved maybe an hour and I perhaps wouldn't have had to revert gregkh-driver-tty-device.patch What mailing list was this discussed and reviewed on? The option should default to "y". The changelog is wrong. Or garbled. Certainly confusing.