From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [take22 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:58:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061106125818.GA20351@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061106103724.GA4535@2ka.mipt.ru>
Hi!
> > Can you explain why kevent is better than kqueue?
>
> According to my tests kevent is noticebly faster.
> It is already too big flag that old system should not be used.
> And half of my previous mail to you shows why kevent is better/different
> from kqueue.
You shown why it is _different_. How much faster is "noticebly
faster"?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-03 16:30 Jonathan Lemon
2006-11-05 20:47 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-06 10:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-06 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-06 10:37 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-06 12:58 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-11-06 13:54 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
[not found] <1154985aa0591036@2ka.mipt.ru>
2006-11-01 11:36 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-01 13:06 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-01 13:25 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-01 16:05 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-01 16:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-01 18:13 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-01 18:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-02 2:12 ` Nate Diller
[not found] ` <aaf959cb0611011829k36deda6ahe61bcb9bf8e612e1@mail.gmail.com>
2006-11-02 2:30 ` zhou drangon
2006-11-02 7:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-02 8:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-02 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-02 8:46 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-02 11:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-06 21:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-11-07 8:32 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-07 9:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-07 12:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-09 7:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-03 2:42 ` zhou drangon
2006-11-03 9:16 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-02 6:21 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-02 19:40 ` Nate Diller
2006-11-03 8:42 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-03 8:57 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-03 9:04 ` David Miller
2006-11-07 12:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-03 9:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-05 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-05 11:43 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-07 12:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-03 18:49 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-04 10:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-04 17:47 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-11-01 16:07 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061106125818.GA20351@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=jlemon@flugsvamp.com \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®