From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965797AbWKODVR (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:21:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965817AbWKODVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:21:16 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:60879 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965797AbWKODVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 22:21:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:21:17 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20061114.192117.112621278.davem@davemloft.net> To: torvalds@osdl.org Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tiwai@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda-intel - Disable MSI support by default From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20061114.190036.30187059.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:10:42 -0800 (PST) > Yours was still an example of "nice". And it had absolutely nothing > to do with the _PROBLEM_. Understood. BTW, some drivers have taken the approch to add MSI self-tests inside of the driver to ensure correct option of MSI on a given machine. There's a lot of resistence to that, the reasons for which I grok fully, but I'm not sure other suggestions such as black lists are any better. Given current experience maybe white-lists are in fact the way to go.