From: Jim Crilly <jim@why.dont.jablowme.net>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Ben Collins <ben.collins@ubuntu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Pushing device/driver binding decisions to userspace
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:11:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114171112.GM4824@voodoo.jdc.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163489520.15249.233.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On 11/14/06 08:32:00AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 17:16 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote:
> > I know that Debian ships both because I have to switch back to the OSS
> > driver whenever I want to play one of those closed source games that mmap
> > /dev/dsp because the ALSA OSS emulation can't seem to handle having the
> > device opened via ALSA and /dev/dsp at the same time and the aoss wrapper
> > doesn't work for apps that use mmap on /dev/dsp.
>
> and this is why shipping 2 drivers suck.
> "A has a bug so I need to use B" is the wrong answer, at least long
> term. The real answer is "fix A".
> I know it sucks for you, but if shipping B means A doesn't get fixed, or
> worse, bugs in A hardly get reported... it means the short term is
> hurting the long term, and just prolongs the pain even for you...
> (since switching drivers is a pain, and more and more stuff is depending
> on alsa nowadays)
>
For the most part I agree and if the OSS emulation in ALSA was better I
would agree completely. But the fact that nothing can use /dev/dsp because
the device doesn't do hardware mixing and some apps are already using the
device via ALSA really sucks. Switching drivers is the least painful part
of the process, the real pain comes from having to kill all of the ALSA
apps to be able to use /dev/dsp in either case. I know that this has
been discussed before and no one has come up with a good way to make the
OSS emulation work with ALSA so I won't push the issue. And Doom3's last
patch did include ALSA support so maybe that's a sign that OSS is really
a thing of the past even in closed source apps.
Jim.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-14 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-12 23:39 Ben Collins
2006-11-13 0:49 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-11-13 1:24 ` Ben Collins
2006-11-13 1:47 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-11-13 5:22 ` Ben Collins
2006-11-13 6:45 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-11-13 7:10 ` Ben Collins
2006-11-13 9:45 ` Martin Mares
2006-11-13 10:13 ` Xavier Bestel
2006-11-23 10:29 ` Greg KH
2006-11-23 11:40 ` Kay Sievers
2006-11-24 3:59 ` Greg KH
2006-11-13 7:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-13 18:51 ` Lee Revell
2006-11-13 20:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-13 22:16 ` Jim Crilly
2006-11-13 22:59 ` Lee Revell
2006-11-13 23:22 ` Jim Crilly
2006-11-13 23:45 ` Lee Revell
2006-11-14 1:14 ` Jim Crilly
2006-11-14 7:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-14 17:11 ` Jim Crilly [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061114171112.GM4824@voodoo.jdc.home \
--to=jim@why.dont.jablowme.net \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ben.collins@ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®