mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: -rc6, "DWARF2 unwinder stuck at" ...
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:16:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061116171614.GA4575@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45351782.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>


Jan,

in 2.6.19-rc6 i'm getting frequent unwinder failures, like:

  [<c0104eb5>] dump_trace+0x69/0x1b0
  [<c0105013>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x17/0x2b
  [<c034e6c4>] __func__.18297+0xf3fd/0x3ccf5
 DWARF2 unwinder stuck at __func__.18297+0xf3fd/0x3ccf5

 Leftover inexact backtrace:

  [<c010534b>] show_trace+0xf/0x11
  [<c0105360>] dump_stack+0x13/0x15
  [<c01419e9>] __lock_acquire+0x6fe/0x98a
  [<c0175956>] cache_alloc_refill+0x8f/0x534
  [<c0141f14>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x77
  [<f0a32963>] __ip_ct_refresh_acct+0x123/0x15b [ip_conntrack]
  [<f0a32963>] __ip_ct_refresh_acct+0x123/0x15b [ip_conntrack]
  [<f0a34acc>] udp_packet+0x9e/0xaa [ip_conntrack]
  [<f0a33437>] ip_conntrack_in+0x385/0x479 [ip_conntrack]
  [<c01215d8>] try_to_wake_up+0x3ea/0x3f4
  [<c0324300>] netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb+0xc8/0x1bd
  [<c02dfe28>] nf_iterate+0x38/0x6a
  [<c02e4dbf>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x271
  [<c02dfeac>] nf_hook_slow+0x52/0xc9
  [<c02e4dbf>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x271
  [<c02e564f>] ip_rcv+0x1fc/0x491
  [<c02e4dbf>] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x271
  [<c02c1f2a>] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0xd5/0xdc
  [<c02e5453>] ip_rcv+0x0/0x491
  [<c02cac42>] netif_receive_skb+0x339/0x366
  [<c02cad04>] process_backlog+0x95/0xed
  [<c02c909e>] net_rx_action+0xad/0x1da
  [<c012bfdc>] ksoftirqd+0x107/0x1e0
  [<c012bed5>] ksoftirqd+0x0/0x1e0
  [<c0139520>] kthread+0xbf/0xeb
  [<c0139461>] kthread+0x0/0xeb
  [<c0104c23>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
  =======================

it's quite an annoyance, i rarely see the unwinder getting a stackdump 
right, without 'falling back' to the inexact backtrace ...

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-16 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060928192048.GA17436@elte.hu>
2006-10-17 15:48 ` [PATCH] Re: UNWIND_INFO slowdown in -mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-10-18  8:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-10-18 10:50   ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-18 11:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-16 17:16   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-11-17  4:57     ` [patch] x86_64: stack unwinder crash fix Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061116171614.GA4575@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome