mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch>
Cc: daniel.ritz@gmx.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: generic calibration support
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:12:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611170912.29317.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611170024.33248.daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch>

> sorry, but i have to give you a big NACK on that one:

Hehe, I actually anticipated this NACK :-)

> - no more modparam: it should be per-device sysfs attributes
>   (swap_xy is basically only for touchkitusb compatibility and 
>    shoud be converted to per-device sysfs attribute as well. i
>   just never got to do it)

That would be okay for me.

> - calibration can be handled in userspace just fine

Yes it can, and that is the most convinging argument against my 
patch.

However, user-space calibration often sucks. For example, in X11 
the calibration values are stored in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, so a 
calibration program has to parse & write that file. And I've 
seen binary-only-calibration programs from vendors 
use /etc/X11/XF86Config, which doesn't exist here. Anyway, once 
you've calibrated you have to restart X-Windows, so you need to 
terminate all running X applications just because of a silly 
re-calibration. Not nice.

A calibration at kernel level (may it be input level or driver 
level) doesn't have this problem. I can make the level 
persistent via udev, modules.conf or other means. Even when I 
have a frame-buffer based calibration utility, the calibration 
would be OK for X11 or GTK/DirectFB as well.

For me, this speaks against "Calibration is purely a user-space 
problem".

> - even for in-kernel it's in the wrong place. there are other
>   devices that report raw absolute data...so it would belong to
>   the input layer 

Suppose I have a graphics tabled and a touchscreen connected at 
the same time. Can I distinguish this easily at the input layer 
level?

I can very easily distinguish this at the device driver level. 
After all, the individual calibration parameters are a property 
of this individual device.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-17  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-16 10:25 Holger Schurig
2006-11-16 23:24 ` Daniel Ritz
2006-11-17  8:12   ` Holger Schurig [this message]
2006-11-17 14:16     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-11-17 14:53       ` Holger Schurig
2006-11-17 15:22         ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200611170912.29317.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
    --to=hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de \
    --cc=daniel.ritz-ml@swissonline.ch \
    --cc=daniel.ritz@gmx.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®