mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6 6/6] rtc-omap driver
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 17:19:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061121171906.5eec32d6.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611201028.48701.david-b@pacbell.net>

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:28:48 -0800
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

> This creates a new RTC-framework driver for the RTC/calendar module found
> in various OMAP1 chips.  (OMAP2 and OMAP3 use external RTCs, like those in
> TI's multifunction PM companion chips.)  It's been in the Linux-OMAP tree
> for several months now, and other trees before that, so it's quite stable.
> The most notable issue is that the OMAP IRQ code doesn't yet support the
> RTC IRQ as a wakeup event.  Once that's fixed, a patch will be needed.
> 
> ...
>
> +static int omap_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
> +{
> +	u8 reg;
> +
> +	/* Much userspace code uses RTC_ALM_SET, thus "don't care" for
> +	 * day/month/year specifies alarms up to 24 hours in the future.
> +	 * So we need to handle that ... but let's ignore the "don't care"
> +	 * values for hours/minutes/seconds.
> +	 */
> +	if (alm->time.tm_mday <= 0
> +			&& alm->time.tm_mon < 0
> +			&& alm->time.tm_year < 0) {
> +		struct rtc_time tm;
> +		unsigned long now, then;
> +
> +		omap_rtc_read_time(dev, &tm);
> +		rtc_tm_to_time(&tm, &now);
> +
> +		alm->time.tm_mday = tm.tm_mday;
> +		alm->time.tm_mon = tm.tm_mon;
> +		alm->time.tm_year = tm.tm_year;
> +		rtc_tm_to_time(&alm->time, &then);
> +
> +		/* sometimes the alarm wraps into tomorrow */
> +		if (then < now) {

This isn't wraparound-safe.  If you have then=0xffffffff and now=0x00000001.

Perhaps that can't happen.

> +MODULE_AUTHOR("George G. Davis (and others)");

Maybe some additional signoffs would be appropirate?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-22  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-20 18:14 [patch 2.6.19-rc6 0/6] more rtc framework/driver updates David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:17 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 1/6] rtc class /proc/driver/rtc update David Brownell
2006-11-20 23:13   ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-11-21  2:47     ` [Bulk] " David Brownell
2006-11-22 20:37       ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-11-23  0:39         ` David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:19 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 2/6] rtc-sa1100 tweaks David Brownell
2006-11-20 22:48   ` Russell King
2006-11-21  1:46     ` David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:22 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 3/6] X86_PC optionally creates rtc_cmos platform device David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:27 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 5/6] rtc-cmos driver David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:27 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 4/6] ACPI exports RTC extensions through platform_data David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:28 ` [patch 2.6.19-rc6 6/6] rtc-omap driver David Brownell
2006-11-20 23:09   ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-11-22  1:19   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-11-22  2:15     ` David Brownell
2006-11-22  2:28       ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-23  0:09         ` David Brownell
2006-11-22 20:34       ` Alessandro Zummo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061121171906.5eec32d6.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome