From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: OOM killer firing on 2.6.18 and later during LTP runs
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:28:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061125132828.16a01762.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4568AFB1.3050500@mbligh.org>
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:03:45 -0800
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
> On 2.6.18-rc7 and later during LTP:
> http://test.kernel.org/abat/48393/debug/console.log
The traces are a bit confusing, but I don't actually see anything wrong
there. The machine has used up all swap, has used up all memory and has
correctly gone and killed things. After that, there's free memory again.
> oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff802638cb>] out_of_memory+0x33/0x220
> [<ffffffff80265374>] __alloc_pages+0x23a/0x2c3
> [<ffffffff802667d2>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x99/0x212
> [<ffffffff80260799>] sync_page+0x0/0x45
> [<ffffffff804b304c>] io_schedule+0x28/0x33
> [<ffffffff804b32b8>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x5b/0x66
> [<ffffffff8043d849>] dm_any_congested+0x3b/0x42
> [<ffffffff80262e50>] filemap_nopage+0x14b/0x353
> [<ffffffff8026cf9a>] __handle_mm_fault+0x387/0x93f
> [<ffffffff804b6366>] do_page_fault+0x44b/0x7ba
> [<ffffffff80245a4e>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280d2, order=0
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff802638cb>] out_of_memory+0x33/0x220
> [<ffffffff80265374>] __alloc_pages+0x23a/0x2c3
> [<ffffffff8026cde3>] __handle_mm_fault+0x1d0/0x93f
> [<ffffffff804b6366>] do_page_fault+0x44b/0x7ba
> [<ffffffff804b2854>] thread_return+0x0/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8020a405>] error_exit+0x0/0x84
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> This doesn't seem to happen every run, unfortnately, only
> intermittently, and we don't have much data before that, so
> hard to tell how long it's been going on.
>
> Still happening on latest kernels.
> http://test.kernel.org/abat/62445/debug/console.log
The same appears to have happened there too. Although it does seem to have
killed a lot more than it should have.
Has something changed in the configuration of that machine? New LTP
version? Less swapsapce?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-25 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-25 21:03 Martin J. Bligh
2006-11-25 21:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-11-25 21:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-11-25 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-26 3:00 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-26 7:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-26 7:25 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-26 7:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-26 11:38 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061125132828.16a01762.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®