From: Chris Friedhoff <chris@friedhoff.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Chris Friedhoff <chris@friedhoff.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: file caps: permit unsafe signaling when CONFIG_FS_CAPS=n
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:19:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061125221902.81746eac.chris@friedhoff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061124181742.GA32443@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
Serge, may I ask you to send a new complete patch with Andrew Mortons
additions and this change and a new changelog entry.
Thanks
Chris
On Fri, 24 Nov
2006 12:17:42 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serue@us.ibm.com):
> > Ok, the following patch restores the CONFIG_FS_CAPS=n signaling
> > behavior, but I'm having a config problem. When
> > CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=n, and I toggle
> > CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES between y and n, security/commoncap.o
> > does not recompile. However since capabilities are now the default
> > security module, commoncap.o is in fact included in the kernel build,
> > and therefore should be recompiled.
> >
> > Looking into why, but maybe someone knows offhand what would be going
> > wrong?
>
> Uh, never mind. It does the right thing. CONFIG_SECURITY=n means we
> use capabilities, but CONFIG_SECURITY=y and CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=n
> means we use dummy. The following patch fixes the Kconfig accordingly.
>
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] file caps: don't show FILE_CAPABILITIES option when not relevant
>
> FILE_CAPABILITIES are relevant when CONFIG_SECURITY=n, but not when
> CONFIG_SECURITY=y && CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=n. So make
> CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES depend on the right conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> security/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index 6c9d69e..1b47f01 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config SECURITY_CAPABILITIES
>
> config SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
> bool "File POSIX Capabilities"
> + depends on SECURITY=n || SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=y
> default n
> help
> This enables filesystem capabilities, allowing you to give
> --
> 1.4.1
>
--------------------
Chris Friedhoff
chris@friedhoff.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-25 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-14 3:06 security: introduce file caps Serge E. Hallyn
2006-11-15 8:55 ` Chris Friedhoff
2006-11-23 8:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-23 8:22 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20061123131203.f7b6972f.chris@friedhoff.org>
2006-11-23 18:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-23 21:41 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-11-23 23:21 ` Chris Friedhoff
2006-11-24 16:16 ` file caps: permit unsafe signaling when CONFIG_FS_CAPS=n Serge E. Hallyn
2006-11-24 18:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-11-25 21:19 ` Chris Friedhoff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061125221902.81746eac.chris@friedhoff.org \
--to=chris@friedhoff.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome