mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org,
	tom@opengridcomputing.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid truncating to 'long' in ALIGN() macro
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:17:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061126111703.33247a84.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ada64d23ty8.fsf@cisco.com>

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:10:23 -0800
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> wrote:

> Commit 4c8bd7ee ("Do not truncate to 'int' in ALIGN() macro.") was
> merged to fix the case of code like the following:
> 
> 	unsigned long addr;
> 	unsigned int alignment;
> 	addr = ALIGN(addr, alignment);
> 
> The original ALIGN macro calculated a mask as ~(alignment - 1), and
> when alignment is just an int, this creates an int mask.  If alignment
> is also unsigned, then this mask will not be sign extended when
> promoted to a long, which leads to the code above chopping off the top
> half of addr when long is 64 bits.
> 
> However, the changed ALIGN macro, which computes the mask as
> ~(alignment - 1UL) actually breaks code like the following when long
> is 32 bits:
> 
> 	u64 addr;
>         int alignment;
>         addr = ALIGN(addr, alignment);
> 
> The reason this breaks is pretty much the same as the original bug
> that the change was supposed to fix: ~(alignment - 1UL) creates a mask
> that is an unsigned long, which is not sign extended when promoted to
> u64 (if long is 32 bits).
> 
> As suggested by Dave Miller and Al Viro, I fixed this by having the
> ALIGN macro make sure the alignment is promoted to the same type as
> the value being aligned before doing the negation.
> 
> This second construct is actually used in the amso1100 driver, so that
> driver does not work on 32-bit architectures right now.  Unfortunately
> almost everyone using it runs 64-bit kernels, so this regression was
> not noticed until now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
> 
> ---
> Patch updated as suggested by Dave Miller and Al Viro...
> 
> can we merge this for 2.6.20?
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 24b6111..80955b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ #define ULLONG_MAX	(~0ULL)
>  #define STACK_MAGIC	0xdeadbeef
>  
>  #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0]))
> -#define ALIGN(x,a) (((x)+(a)-1UL)&~((a)-1UL))
> +#define ALIGN(x,a) ((typeof(x)) (((x) + (a) - 1) & ~((typeof(x)) (a) - 1)))
>  #define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
>  #define DIV_ROUND_UP(n,d) (((n) + (d) - 1) / (d))
>  #define roundup(x, y) ((((x) + ((y) - 1)) / (y)) * (y))

I'd be inclined to merge it for 2.6.19.  Is everyone OK with it?

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-26 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-25  5:40 Roland Dreier
2006-11-25  6:07 ` David Miller
2006-11-25 22:56   ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-25 23:05     ` David Miller
2006-11-25 23:09       ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-26  0:41         ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-26 19:09           ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-26 19:10           ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-26 19:17             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-11-26 20:06               ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-26 20:11               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-26 20:26                 ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-26 21:06                   ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-26 22:20                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-27  4:41                     ` Al Viro
2006-11-26  1:10       ` Al Viro
2006-11-26  1:17         ` Roland Dreier
2006-11-26  1:25           ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061126111703.33247a84.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®