From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933542AbWK1AJs (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:09:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933563AbWK1AJs (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:09:48 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:54402 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933542AbWK1AJs (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:09:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:08:55 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Akinobu Mita Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: check platform_device_register_simple() error Message-Id: <20061127160855.297667fa.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061127050915.GH1231@APFDCB5C> References: <20061127050915.GH1231@APFDCB5C> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:09:15 +0900 Akinobu Mita wrote: > This patch checks the return value of platform_device_register_simple(). > > Cc: David Brownell > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita > > --- > drivers/spi/spi_butterfly.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > Index: work-fault-inject/drivers/spi/spi_butterfly.c > =================================================================== > --- work-fault-inject.orig/drivers/spi/spi_butterfly.c > +++ work-fault-inject/drivers/spi/spi_butterfly.c > @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ static void butterfly_attach(struct parp > * setting up a platform device like this is an ugly kluge... > */ > pdev = platform_device_register_simple("butterfly", -1, NULL, 0); > + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) > + return; It'd be nice to at least print some (non-debug) message rather than simply mysteriously failing. It'd be nicer if parport_driver.attach() didn't return void. Ho hum.