From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936480AbWLALvd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:51:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936482AbWLALvd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:51:33 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:2793 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936480AbWLALvc (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 06:51:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:58:10 +0000 From: Alan To: ron moncreiff Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: trying pata_ali in 2.6.19 Message-ID: <20061201115810.55a4b66a@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <456FC859.9070709@cruzers.com> References: <456FC859.9070709@cruzers.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:14:49 -0800 ron moncreiff wrote: > // I have tried out the new pata options in the 2.6.19 kernel and had > some problems. // > // So here's the skinny. I am using the asrock 939dual - sataII mobo. > lspci reports // > // the IDE interface thus: // As you've no doubt noticed it isn't supposed to oops. Can you send me an lspci -vxx of your system and in the mean time I will go and stare at the code and see what is going on. > // declarations (definitions ?) that seem to reference various revisions > of the chip. Mine is a c7 and there's no // > // structure for that one. Could this be the problem? C7 is quite new but the info blocks cover ranges of versions not specific versions. It shouldn't be the cause but... Alan