From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: reiserfs NET=n build error
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:19:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061204161906.f3531b75.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061128114757.8b027341.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:47:57 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 17:32:11 -0500 Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 11:04:33AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >>>>> I would copy a relatively simple C implementation, like
> > >>>>> arch/h8300/lib/checksum.c
> > >>>> As long as the h8300 version has the same output as the x86 version.
> > >>> The trouble is that the different architecture have different output
> > >>> for csum_partial. So you already got a bug when someone wants to move
> > >>> file systems.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Andi
> > >> That argues for having only one version of it (in a lib.; my preference)
> > >> -or- Every module having its own local copy/version of it. :(
> > >
> > > Wrong. csum_partial() result is defined modulo 0xffff and it's basically
> > > "whatever's convenient as intermediate for this architecture".
> > >
> > > reiserfs use of it is just plain broken. net/* is fine, since all
> > > final uses are via csum_fold() or equivalents.
> > >
> > > Note that reiserfs use is broken in another way: it takes fixed-endian value
> > > and feeds it to cpu_to_le32(). IOW, even if everything had literally the
> > > same csum_partial(), the value it shits on disk would be endian-dependent.
> >
> > Oh great. Even better. :(
>
> Even more: MD/raid (=m) is broken in this way also.
> It uses csum_partial(), which isn't present (CONFIG_NET=n).
>
> Kernel: arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage is ready (#9)
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 101 modules
> WARNING: "csum_partial" [drivers/md/md-mod.ko] undefined!
> make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> make: *** [modules] Error 2
>
> CONFIG_MD=y
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD=m
> CONFIG_MD_LINEAR=m
> # CONFIG_MD_RAID0 is not set
> CONFIG_MD_RAID1=m
> # CONFIG_MD_RAID10 is not set
> # CONFIG_MD_RAID456 is not set
> CONFIG_MD_MULTIPATH=m
> # CONFIG_MD_FAULTY is not set
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y
> CONFIG_DM_DEBUG=y
> CONFIG_DM_CRYPT=m
> CONFIG_DM_SNAPSHOT=y
> CONFIG_DM_MIRROR=y
> CONFIG_DM_ZERO=m
> CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH=y
> CONFIG_DM_MULTIPATH_EMC=m
>
> ---
> ~Randy
> full broken config for MD:
> http://oss.oracle.com/~rdunlap/configs/config-md-csum
Ingo, Neil:
Al has summarized that csum_partial() is arch-specific.
However, drivers/md/md.c uses it.
Does that mean that RAID volumes are not portable across
(some) architectures?
Should md.c use a specific, known, fixed (as in static,
arch-independent) version of csum_partial()?
Will changing now possibly make some existing volumes
non-portable?
Thanks,
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-05 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-19 4:22 Randy Dunlap
2006-11-19 5:50 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-19 17:09 ` Jeff Mahoney
2006-11-19 18:59 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-19 19:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-19 20:57 ` Al Viro
2006-11-19 21:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-19 22:32 ` Jeff Mahoney
2006-11-28 19:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-05 0:19 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2006-12-05 1:20 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-19 20:12 ` Jeff Mahoney
2006-11-19 20:52 ` Al Viro
2006-11-19 14:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-19 14:53 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061204161906.f3531b75.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome