From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Assorted minor fixes for mainline
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:04:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061208160455.05a81359.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061208120132.21203.patches@notabene>
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:05:24 +1100
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> Following are 5 patches for md in 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 that are suitable for 2.6.20.
>
> Patch 4 might fix an outstanding bug against md which manifests as an
> oops early in boot, but I don't have test results yet.
>
> NeilBrown
>
> [PATCH 001 of 5] md: Remove some old ifdefed-out code from raid5.c
> [PATCH 002 of 5] md: Return a non-zero error to bi_end_io as appropriate in raid5.
> [PATCH 003 of 5] md: Assorted md and raid1 one-liners
> [PATCH 004 of 5] md: Close a race between destroying and recreating an md device.
> [PATCH 005 of 5] md: Allow mddevs to live a bit longer to avoid a loop with udev.
md-change-lifetime-rules-for-md-devices.patch still has a cloud over its
head (Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>'s repeatable failure), so I staged these
new patches as below:
md-fix-innocuous-bug-in-raid6-stripe_to_pdidx.patch
#
md-conditionalize-some-code.patch
+md-remove-some-old-ifdefed-out-code-from-raid5c.patch
+md-return-a-non-zero-error-to-bi_end_io-as-appropriate-in-raid5.patch
+md-assorted-md-and-raid1-one-liners.patch
md-change-lifetime-rules-for-md-devices.patch
+md-close-a-race-between-destroying-and-recreating-an-md-device.patch
+md-allow-mddevs-to-live-a-bit-longer-to-avoid-a-loop-with-udev.patch
So the last three are maybe-not-for-2.6.20.
Does that sounds sane?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-09 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-08 1:05 NeilBrown
2006-12-08 1:05 ` [PATCH 001 of 5] md: Remove some old ifdefed-out code from raid5.c NeilBrown
2006-12-08 1:05 ` [PATCH 002 of 5] md: Return a non-zero error to bi_end_io as appropriate in raid5 NeilBrown
2006-12-08 1:05 ` [PATCH 003 of 5] md: Assorted md and raid1 one-liners NeilBrown
2006-12-08 1:05 ` [PATCH 004 of 5] md: Close a race between destroying and recreating an md device NeilBrown
2006-12-08 1:05 ` [PATCH 005 of 5] md: Allow mddevs to live a bit longer to avoid a loop with udev NeilBrown
2006-12-09 0:04 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-12-09 8:51 ` [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Assorted minor fixes for mainline Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061208160455.05a81359.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®