From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sysfs file creation result nightmare (WAS radeonfb: Fix sysfs_create_bin_file warnings)
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:58:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061209135829.86038f32.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061209214453.GA69320@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:44:53 +0100
Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 12:38:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 06:59:10 +1100
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > > Why would I prevent the framebuffer from initializing (and thus a
> > > console to be displayed at all on many machines) just because for some
> > > reason, I couldn't create a pair of EDID files in sysfs that are not
> > > even very useful anymore ?
> >
> > Because there's a bug in your kernel. We don't hide and work around bugs.
>
> Hmmm, I don't understand. Which is the bug, having a sysfs file
> creation fail or going on if it happens?
Probably the former, probably the latter.
There may be situations in which we want do to "create this sysfs file if
it doesn't already exist", but I'm not aware of any such.
Generally speaking, if sysfs file creation went wrong, it's due to a bug.
The result is that the driver isn't working as intended: tunables or
instrumentation which it is designed to make available are not present. We
want to know about that bug asap so we can get it fixed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-09 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20061209165606.2f026a6c.khali@linux-fr.org>
2006-12-09 19:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-09 20:22 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-12-09 20:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-09 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-09 20:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-09 21:44 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-12-09 21:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-12-09 22:34 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-12-09 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-10 0:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-15 14:47 ` sysfs file creation result nightmare Jean Delvare
2006-12-15 20:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-15 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-20 8:01 ` Greg KH
2006-12-20 9:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-11 2:46 ` sysfs file creation result nightmare (WAS radeonfb: Fix sysfs_create_bin_file warnings) Paul Mackerras
2006-12-14 21:42 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061209135829.86038f32.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=galibert@pobox.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®